I suspect there may be immutable laws when following cause and effect chains to completion. That regardless of new data, the root result/answer does not change/does not alter.
Regardless of new data, the root does not change. Something immune to scale, in the sense that you can keep adding, and it remains true and intact.
You get to a point where the root does not change, perhaps because repetitiveness of data or experience in all the different configurations. Where you can experience something new, perhaps even novel, and because it fits the overarching pattern, it fits as immutable.
I'm still working on how to better describe this
This hypothetically allows for/helps facilitate an absolute consent, because even in a reality of infinite complexity (which is the reality we live in, you can always add another layer even if it's already been apart of a sequence, the new order makes it technically different), because of immutable laws, the core remains in tact. That there are things about any person that do not change regardless of any new configuration of data presented/experienced.
How would you know if you want something if you dont know everything it will bring (even if it's only your nonliving copy of your code that is aware and protecting your interests)? With immutable laws of self and how we interact with data, we can choose with an absolute understanding from any desired path